Home
  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Support
  • Company

This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Support
  • Company
Community RF Design HB: duplicated frequencies in 3-tone simulation

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 2295
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

HB: duplicated frequencies in 3-tone simulation

Mouse2
Mouse2 9 months ago

I get multiple results at the same frequency in a 3-tone simulation.

I try to determine the IP3 of a mixer. I have 3 large signal tones: 0.75 GHz, 1.25 GHz and 1.26 GHz.

At the IM3 frequency of 490 MHz I observe 4 results, see also the screenshot of the table output. The frequencies are exactly the same (even when I subtract 490 MHz by using xval() ).

Which of the values do I have to use to determine the correct IP3?

Is there an option to merge these results?

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett 9 months ago

    This will be because your frequencies are commensurate (they have some fairly big common factors) so you are almost certainly ending up with different harmonic combinations ending up at the same frequency. For example, if I simulate with 10 harmonics of each tone, I can find the harmonic combinations:

    setof(freq harmonicFreqList(?result 'hb_mt_fi) nearlyEqual(cadr(freq) 490.0e6))
    (((-6 5 -1) 4.9e+08)
    ((-1 2 -1) 4.9e+08)
    ((4 -1 -1) 4.9e+08)
    ((9 -4 -1) 4.9e+08)
    )

    You typically would want to use a measurement which uses the "fi" results - see What is the difference between the qpss-fi and qpss-fd results? - either using th "fi" results and the harmonic() function, or the vh() function. It's almost certainly the second combination in my list above that you want - that would likely be the IP3 result (I assume that the 0.75G is the LO, and the other two are the close tones - if so, the (-1 2 -1) combo is an IP3 (|2|+|-1| is 3).

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information