• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Allegro X PCB Editor
  3. Test point creation workflow recommendations?

Stats

  • State Verified Answer
  • Replies 5
  • Answers 1
  • Subscribers 161
  • Views 4010
  • Members are here 0
More Content

Test point creation workflow recommendations?

JS202408156358
JS202408156358 10 months ago

I am trying to figure out the most efficient workflow for adding test points. My use case involves adding ~100 or so SMT pads at the bottom for bed-of-nails ICT test that are required to be on a test point grid. A lot of the nets are on the top or from inner layers and so have to be brought to the bottom using stubs. I'm used to Xpediiton workflow of being able to set a test point padstack, set a test point grid, and then select a net, add the test point to the bottom layer on the grid with that net attached and then route the stub with gridless routing.

In Orcad, it seems I need to route the stub, switch layer pairs to be both bottom once I bring the stub to the bottom and then change the grid to be the test point grid and then add the test point on the grid. It requires a lot of clicks, very mistake prone requiring lots of oops and very slow for 100+ test points to be brought out at the bottom. 

I'm sure there is a better way that is used by folks with a lot of Orcad experience. Any suggestions?

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • excellon1
    0 excellon1 10 months ago

    Hi, I think one of the better methods to add the testpoints is to use Specctra. This would be the PCB Router, It is under the Route PCB Router menu. You can generate the testpoints in here automatically. You could also use the interactive route so as to add stubs manually if you wanted. Since you only have 100 TP's to do, The method of adding these to the schematic as a single pin "TP" would probably be your easiest option.

    Best regards.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • JS202408156358
    0 JS202408156358 10 months ago in reply to excellon1

    Thank you. I will explore that and test it out. Agreed, best is schematic driven TPs.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • JS202408156358
    0 JS202408156358 10 months ago in reply to excellon1

    Thank you. I will explore that and test it out. Agreed, best is schematic driven TPs.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information