• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Specifying Branch Topology in Allegro PCB

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9
  • Subscribers 165
  • Views 18619
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Specifying Branch Topology in Allegro PCB

mvonahnen
mvonahnen over 17 years ago

 Is it possible to specify the topology of the routing that SPECCTRA will do in the constraint manager of Allegro?  I have seen posts about using virtual pins set up in SPECCTRA to do this, but I have not seen any examples of this being generated from contraint inputs.

 If it can be set up from Allegro, how is the branches specified so that the relative propogation delay is controlled from the branch point?  If it is not possible, is there a way of specifying this in SPECCTRA?

  • Cancel
Parents
  • mcatramb91
    mcatramb91 over 17 years ago

    I believe, but have not had time to verify, that if you define a Topology (ECSET) in Constraints Manager with pin to t-point Relative Prop Delay / Prop Delays that Specctra will adhere to them while Routing.  I know Cadence has gone thru many lengths to insure that the rules from Constraint Manager are passed to / aligned with Specctra so you get the rules you are looking to achieve. The other added benefit in doing it in Constraint Manager is that at least if you need to modify these critical nets in Allegro you will get DRC errors but if these rules are driven inside of a Specctra Do File you will not get any DRC errors in Allegro because the rules don't come back from Specctra.  I have many designs that use Topology driven routing with delays to t-points and I will try to make some time to do some tests then let you know how I make out.

    Hope this helps,
    Michael Catrambone
    UTStarcom, Inc.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • mcatramb91
    mcatramb91 over 17 years ago

    I believe, but have not had time to verify, that if you define a Topology (ECSET) in Constraints Manager with pin to t-point Relative Prop Delay / Prop Delays that Specctra will adhere to them while Routing.  I know Cadence has gone thru many lengths to insure that the rules from Constraint Manager are passed to / aligned with Specctra so you get the rules you are looking to achieve. The other added benefit in doing it in Constraint Manager is that at least if you need to modify these critical nets in Allegro you will get DRC errors but if these rules are driven inside of a Specctra Do File you will not get any DRC errors in Allegro because the rules don't come back from Specctra.  I have many designs that use Topology driven routing with delays to t-points and I will try to make some time to do some tests then let you know how I make out.

    Hope this helps,
    Michael Catrambone
    UTStarcom, Inc.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information