• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Allegro on Linux - performance enhanced?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 166
  • Views 3761
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Allegro on Linux - performance enhanced?

mbecker
mbecker over 16 years ago

Does Allegro run appreciably faster under Linux?

Can it be configured to?

Thanks!

  • Cancel
  • oldmouldy
    oldmouldy over 16 years ago

    I have a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 64-bit box based on a 2.4GHz Intel Core Duo and a Windows Vista 64-bit based on a 3GHz Intel Core Duo and I would say that the Linux box seems quite a bit faster in "normal" use, though I don't have objective measurements to confirm or deny this. Running RHEL 4 64-bit, the performance was pretty comparable but RHEL 5 64-bit seems faster again. I don't know about configuring, both of the machines are in a pretty "default" configuration. The Windows box does run AV software which might be to its disadvantage.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Khurana
    Khurana over 16 years ago
    In our experiment, we found SPB tools to be processor speed centric versus being RAM centric i.e. greater the processor speed, the faster the tool.  That said, we didn't notice any fastness on RHEL v4 vis a vis WinXP Pro.  Allegro PCB is not like Specctra or Allegro SI which read/writes to/from memory.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcbgeorge
    pcbgeorge over 16 years ago
    I ran a benchmark a while ago, with RHEL4 on a Dell Optiplex GX270 (single P4 2.8Ghz processor, 512K memory) and WimXP SP2 on a Dell Precision 650 (dual Xeon 2.66Ghz, 2 GB memory).  Linux "out of the box" with no tweaking on the middle-of-the-road PC was roughly 3-4x faster on a standard benchmark than a higher-end workstation running WinXP.
     
    I ran the benchmark on a virtual machine running Vista and a virtual machine running XP.  XP was roughly 2-3x as fast as Vista.  This was on virtual machines, and no tweaking was done to either OS.
     
    Your mileage may vary :)
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information