• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. 3D View of Part in 16.5 not the same in symbol editor as...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 14350
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

3D View of Part in 16.5 not the same in symbol editor as PCB Editor

ScottCad
ScottCad over 13 years ago

Ok in 16.5 this 3d viewer is acting kind of wierd in particular with the Z plane.

If you create a Shape on the Package Geometry top class and enter the height parameter as a positive when you hit the 3d button to display the 3d representation of the shape it is flipped, I.E the default view is negative with respect to the Z plane. Now if you enter a negative height properity for a shape then the 3d view looks fine when creating symbols.

Here is the issue. If you use negative height parameters so your 3d part looks ok in the symbol editor when you place the part on the  board and hit the 3d Button the actual visual representation of the 3d shape is negative. Seems like a bug with the Z scaling between symbol editor and pcb editor. Anyone come across this ?

Steps to reproduce would be

Create a rectangle in the symbol editor on the package gem top class, give it a min height value of 0 and a max height value of say 50, click the 3d button, you will have to pan tilt to see that the positive z plane height is negative.

Thanks Scott 

  • Cancel
  • Roger BFS
    Roger BFS over 13 years ago

    I have noticed the same behavior when starting the 3D viewer in symbol editor.  The Z-axis is displayed negatively as far as interpretation of the height parameters defined in the symbol.   The 3D view of the board after the symbol is placed is correct as anticipated.  I just wrote it off as a bug that might get fixed some day - not a show stopper for me.

    Roger Green

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • steve
    steve over 13 years ago

    This is a known issue because of the way the symbol is defined. I would recommend contacting Cadence/VAR and raising an SR to let them know that you want this fixed.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2026 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information