• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Allegro Placement Challenge

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 166
  • Views 13374
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Allegro Placement Challenge

RTMORA2
RTMORA2 over 12 years ago
I am working on a project that consists of 2 boards placed one directly above the other very close together. They are so close that the component heights of parts on the bottom side of the board above will affect the placement of parts on the board below. In effect I will be interleaving the tall and short components between both boards. This will be a common scenario for a few projects down the road, so I thought it would be worthwhile looking into.I have a few ideas on how to manage placement conflicts during the placement phase of the design, but would like to hear from anyone that has come across this design challenge. One of my ideas was to design both boards as one as if they were in a 2 up panel since the board outlines of both boards are identical. Then I could play some games with the bounding boxes. But this method starts to complicate the design with other issues.

Any suggestions will be appreciated.

  • Cancel
Parents
  • ScottCad
    ScottCad over 12 years ago

    I think it would be best to just design two seperate boards that way eco's etc will be a whole lot easier to handle. The other option would be to combine both boards into one larger board with a score down the middle of the PCB so they could be broken apart, doing that you could look at the whole design with the allegro 3d viewer to gain perspective on component height. 

    Keep in mind things like heat. The board that produces the most heat should be placed on top.

    Thanks Scott

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ScottCad
    ScottCad over 12 years ago

    I think it would be best to just design two seperate boards that way eco's etc will be a whole lot easier to handle. The other option would be to combine both boards into one larger board with a score down the middle of the PCB so they could be broken apart, doing that you could look at the whole design with the allegro 3d viewer to gain perspective on component height. 

    Keep in mind things like heat. The board that produces the most heat should be placed on top.

    Thanks Scott

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information