• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. maggic via(reverse)

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 998
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

maggic via(reverse)

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Hello guys,

Same topic here?No.
It was seperation once. It is full connection now.

I'd quote my previous methord,which was not payed attention on.

A via, a negative plane, both net gnd.

Set a flash whose o-d is smaller then the diameter of the relavent drilled hole.
would the via be full-conneted with the plane?

Set the thirmal relief null or circle.then when generating artwork, there would be a warning"regular pad instead". Finally the artwork could identify the via with warning,and
discard the via.Only the the hole would be in use when the board is manufactured.Then
would the via be full-conneted with the plane?

Regards,
Summer NCUT


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by tfsummer
  • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    I agree.

    Setting a flash outer diameter samller then the diameter of the drill would be a full-connect to its assoicated plane.
    I have been doing this for a long time and it works without fail. My only suggestion is specify a Thermal Flash name
    which is descriptive like "DIRECT_CONNECTION" , "FULL_CONTACT", "NO_THERMAL" so its clear to the
    FAB Vendor what needs to be done.

    At one time setting the Thermal Relief to NULL would cause an errror or unepected results during artwork generation.
    I seem to rememeber the regular pad being used in these cases but the results may not be what you are looking for.

    Anyone else out there have an ideas or suggestions ?

    Hope this helps,
    Mike Catrambone


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by mcatramb91
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Oh, I think if the regular pad is applied for substitution, it would likely be no other than "seperation"
    My consideration is the size: regular pad is bigger than the drilled hole, but smaller than the anti-pad.regularly,right?
    then,if the common seperation way is to plot the antipad away in the layer,how about plot away the regular pad away,according to the same charactor of both regular pad and antipad: bigger dia than the drilled-hole.
    Is that possible?

    Mike,thank you very much, i believe that your sharing the smaller-flash experience has greately helped and encouraged me!

    NCUT
    summer


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by tfsummer
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information