• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. PCB Design
  3. Long Reference Designators

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 164
  • Views 13047
  • Members are here 0
More Content
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Long Reference Designators

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Our CM is complaining about the long reference designators created by Concept-HDL from hierarchical designs.   Some of their software only accepts 7 character reference designators.

In a design that has 4 levels, we have strings up to twenty characters. For example DAC1_CHAN0_MOD0_REG0.  We can shrink that to something like U1C0M0R0 but that is still 8 characters and harder to read.  It could easily go to 9 or more if the number for each level exceded 1 character. 

We need to use hierarchy for effeciency and clarity in the design.

Anyone else run into this problem? And do you have any suggestions about how to resolve it in the design data? 


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by dallas
  • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Yes, we ran into the very same issue a few years ago when we first started implementing Design Reuse. We concluded that we really needed TWO reference designators, one for our engineering folks and one for the Manufacturing/MRP/PDM/Documentation folks.

    The Engineering ref des would preserve the hierarchical nature of the design and would be very intuitive to the engineers in showing the inherited relationships in the design.

    The other ref des would meet the needs of the other downstream systems that have restrictions on character length.

    We have communicated this need to Cadence. I'm not sure if this is still on their radar screen to implement. I would certainly invite you (and others) to join the party and request this!

    In the mean time, the engineers in our company have to sacrifice for the sake of the other systems.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by cdavies
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    hi,
    we r using hierarchical design and we encountered a serious prob....we cnat found any reference designators for the components..plz help to solve this...

    thanks in advance


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by joe_nimbeon
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Joe,

    I'm not sure what you mean.  Could you please provide additional details.  Is this a schematic problem (Capture or Concept)?  Is this a layout problem?

    If it's a schematic problem and you're usign Concept, have you turned on Occurrence Edit Mode?


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by cdavies
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information