• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Adams Car
  3. Have A/Car Token Requirements Changed over the last few...

Following Cadence Design Systems’ acquisition of the Design & Engineering (D&E) business, the D&E Community Forum on the Nexus Community Center has been migrated in the Cadence Physical System Simulation Community. For more details and if you have any questions, please refer to the FAQ.

Stats

  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 1
  • Views 2
  • Members are here 0
More Content

Have A/Car Token Requirements Changed over the last few years?

jpatterson
jpatterson over 9 years ago
I have an old (~2009, ADAMS 2007 r1) A/Car full vehicle model I'm attempting to resurrect. This is a full tractor-trailer model with PAC2002 tires and flex bodies operating on the MDI_2d_Flat road. I'm opening this up in ADAMS 2017.1 and trying to run some of my old file driven events. The run stops when I appear to run our of tokens (???). So did the required number of tokens change (go up!) since I've been running these models?
  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
Parents
  • MK202610123211
    0 MK202610123211 over 9 years ago
    Well I guess you'll hear the same answer as if you'd ask Fiat, Renault, Hyundai or others if they use defeat devices. They all claim they'd stay within legal limits, but funnily have much higher emisions than domestic brands in real-life-tests.
    (Latest Source: ADAC measurements nemo-responsive-image.live.cf.public.springer.com/.../4by3 )
     
    Anyway the MSC master Key tokens sucked from the beginning and are outdated, too.
    MSC One is the new kid in town.
    If you have a larger amount of users you can still negotiate with MSC not on a "we need xxx tokens" base but on "we'd like to pay yyy $ for xxx users".
    In the latter case you just track the number of users and the costs for MSC licenses which pretty quickly reveals any cheating.
    The bad news: Yes, the licenses became more expensive over the years.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • MK202610123211
    0 MK202610123211 over 9 years ago
    Well I guess you'll hear the same answer as if you'd ask Fiat, Renault, Hyundai or others if they use defeat devices. They all claim they'd stay within legal limits, but funnily have much higher emisions than domestic brands in real-life-tests.
    (Latest Source: ADAC measurements nemo-responsive-image.live.cf.public.springer.com/.../4by3 )
     
    Anyway the MSC master Key tokens sucked from the beginning and are outdated, too.
    MSC One is the new kid in town.
    If you have a larger amount of users you can still negotiate with MSC not on a "we need xxx tokens" base but on "we'd like to pay yyy $ for xxx users".
    In the latter case you just track the number of users and the costs for MSC licenses which pretty quickly reveals any cheating.
    The bad news: Yes, the licenses became more expensive over the years.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2026 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information