Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Does anyone have a recommended rule set for tracking out of a .5mm BGA. Its only the two outer rows that are used. I'm trying to find manufacturers recommendations but so far no joy.Specifics.Would you use microvias to escape from the 2nd row, or go between the outer pads on the 'top' layer? What is the recommended pad size? (ball dia = .25-.35) but theres nothing about the 'pad' size on the bga which connects the ball.Thanks..
Route between if possible. Microvias are expensive. You will need fine line substrate supplier which is also expensive. Pad size depends on solder mask defined pads or non-solder mask defined pads which again depends on the substrate supplier. Your trying to design in a vacuum. (no offence) You need to identify a substrate supplier and an assembly supplier and obtain their design rules.
So what did you eventually do?? We're curious.
I've always been forced to use microvias, because they are more common and slightly more reliable than really narrow traces - as far as reliability and yield is concerned..5mm is a pain, but doable.Greg
For .5mm BGAs, only outer 2 rows used, I'd tend to go with .003+ traces and not uVias. There are plenty of companies that will do .003" lines using 3/8oz CU. Some might even try using 1/2oz if they're good. I've got 2 suppliers in So. CAL that do it for me at the moment. Getting really good results.Good day.Mitch
Hi cartouche,You can try the following link:http://www.pcblibraries.com/resources/GEN-docs.aspthere are many useful tips aboult BGA layout rules!chenli
Yeah, we've found that 3 mil lines/spacing is preferred (i.e. cheaper) than micro-vias. This is especially true in high-volume production overseas. As micro-vias become more prevalent, that may change. At first, I was reluctant to use them (I thought it would be more difficult to design with them), but after doing umpteen boards with micro/blind/buried vias, I practically beg marketing to let me use them.