• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Problems visualizing results with Wavescan - MMSIM 6.2 ...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 128
  • Views 2877
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Problems visualizing results with Wavescan - MMSIM 6.2 - IC 5.1.14

yoyega
yoyega over 15 years ago

 Hi, I am using MMSIM 6.2 with IC.5.1.14. I have to run a large tran simulation with spectre and I've been having problems at the moment of visualizing the results with wavescan. According to sourcelink solution 11264780 I should set the following variable to have the tran.tran file broken up in 2GB files: setenv PSF_WRITE_CHUNK_MODE_ON true. So I have set this environment variable, but I still have only one tran.tran file of 70GB. Is there a solution for this?

 

Thanks,

Pedro

 

 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • apaj
    apaj over 11 years ago

    First of all, sorry about the breaking the rules - I really do apologize. I'll keep that in mind from now on (except for this post :) ).

    Thank you very much for your time and a very thorough and clear answer - I really do appreciate it.

    It did hit my mind to reduce the number of points in the simulation, but once I got hooked on this format issue, I really wanted to go through it to the end.

    From your answer I understood that it already is at the end. Namely,

    1. in order to do SP analysis, psfbin is the format used anyway, there is no choice (at least for my version of software).

    2. psfbin allows chunks only for transient analysis, so I am limited to a 2 GB file anyway.

    Therefore, in order to do my analysis, the only way out is to reduce the accuracy of the simulation, be it reducing the number of points or the number of parasitics or any other way.

    Once again, I am very greatful - thank you very much.

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • apaj
    apaj over 11 years ago

    First of all, sorry about the breaking the rules - I really do apologize. I'll keep that in mind from now on (except for this post :) ).

    Thank you very much for your time and a very thorough and clear answer - I really do appreciate it.

    It did hit my mind to reduce the number of points in the simulation, but once I got hooked on this format issue, I really wanted to go through it to the end.

    From your answer I understood that it already is at the end. Namely,

    1. in order to do SP analysis, psfbin is the format used anyway, there is no choice (at least for my version of software).

    2. psfbin allows chunks only for transient analysis, so I am limited to a 2 GB file anyway.

    Therefore, in order to do my analysis, the only way out is to reduce the accuracy of the simulation, be it reducing the number of points or the number of parasitics or any other way.

    Once again, I am very greatful - thank you very much.

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information