Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 14762
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Can run simulation with MMSIM72 but cannot run with MMSIM62

abyan

 Hi,

in my lab we use two linux server (5.2) for cedence (5.10.41....).

For running ADE simulator, one machine use MMSIM72, and the other one uses MMSIM62.

Edit: For a certain PDK,

I can run simulation successfully with MMSIM72, but running it with MMSIM62 always gives convergence errors, like this:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Error found by spectre during IC analysis, during transient analysis `tran'.
    ERROR (SPECTRE-16080): No DC solution found (no convergence). 

The values for those nodes that did not converge on the last Newton iteration are given below.  The manner in which the convergence criteria were not satisfied is also given.
            Failed test: | Value | > RelTol*Ref + AbsTol

    V(CLK) = 0 V
        residue too large: | -12 uA | > 60.0001 nA + 1 pA

 

******************
DC Analysis `dcOp'
******************

Error found by spectre during DC analysis `dcOp'.
    ERROR (SPECTRE-16041): Analysis was skipped due to inability to compute operating point.
Warning from spectre during DC analysis `dcOp'.
    WARNING (SPECTRE-16518): Arithmetic exception in analysis `dcOp' .

~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

My question: is using MMSIM72 the only thing I can do to solve this problem?

 

best regards,

sigit

Parents

  • As Mark quite rightly pointed out, it's probably specific to the actual circuit and models being used - maybe some improvement has been made. Not sure why you have software releases tied to specific machines - normally you'd have the software accessed over the network, which makes things much more flexible.

    So it's not really possible to diagnose the cause of the convergence failure without the circuit and the PDK; since it's solved using a later version of MMSIM, I'd suggest you use that rather than waste energy trying to understand why this old version struggles with that specific case.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

Reply

  • As Mark quite rightly pointed out, it's probably specific to the actual circuit and models being used - maybe some improvement has been made. Not sure why you have software releases tied to specific machines - normally you'd have the software accessed over the network, which makes things much more flexible.

    So it's not really possible to diagnose the cause of the convergence failure without the circuit and the PDK; since it's solved using a later version of MMSIM, I'd suggest you use that rather than waste energy trying to understand why this old version struggles with that specific case.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.