• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. How to perform Post-Layout simulations using UltraSim for...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 15542
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to perform Post-Layout simulations using UltraSim for Black-Box Cells?

BraveHeart
BraveHeart over 13 years ago

I hope you all are doing fine. I need some guidance regarding post-layout simulation of black-box digital cells from Artisan Standard Cell Library using Ultrasim. We have the verilog, lef and tlf files in the PDK along with CDB symbol database that we converted to OA database. We have imported verilog view in the library and therefore we have the symbol, cmos-sch and the functional views.

For example, I have done the automated layout and P&R using Encounter for two inverters in series. I have imported the gate-level netlist and the gds file in Virtuoso and have been able to succesfully perform DRC and LVS (using the black-box cells parameter for the LVS).  The pre-layout (post-synthesis) simulations have also been successful using the Hierarchy Editor, changing the Standard-Cell's view to functional and using Spectre-Verilog or Ultra-Sim from inside the ADE.

However, when we create the av_extracted view, since the inverters cells are black-box, they are not present in the extracted netlist. When we create a dspf file from RCX extraction, the cell instance is there. But we run into following issues:

1. What is the method of using a dspf file through hierarchy editor? When we specify it as a source file there, it is not able to see through the hierarchy and find the embedded inverter cell instances.

2. Are we supposed to simulated the dspf in UltraSim through command-line? From here, UltraSim looks for subckt definition of inverter cell, which we do not have. Since the DSPF already has all the interconnect parasitics, we believe connecting a functional instance in that netlist would also suffice. But how to include the Verilog cell definition while using UltraSim through command-line?

 Thanks and best regards,

arsalan

 

  • Cancel
  • Quek
    Quek over 13 years ago

    Hi arsalan

    You can also specify the dspf file in ADE-L as follows:
    a. Set simulator as ultrasim
    b. Go to "Simulation->Options->Analog"
    c. Select "Post layout" tab
    d. Press the "Setting" button for "Parasitic RC stitching"

    Hope that this will help to solve your problem.

    Best regards
    Quek



    • stitch.gif
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • BraveHeart
    BraveHeart over 13 years ago

    Hi Quek

    Thanks for your reply. I specified the dpf file as per your advice and the simulation has completed successfully and a graph is also plotted but results are not correct! Actually ultrasim is not able to find the 'INVXL' subcircuit. (which is Artisan's standard cell). Here is the message:

    Notic from UltraSim in 'INVXL'

    Subcircuit 'INVXL' is empty.

    Please tell me how ultrasim would be able to identify or locate functional/verilog description of INVXL, i.e. dpf file has had all the required extracted 'R' 'C' parasitics and INVXL at the end of dspf (or dpf) netlist as:

     *Instance section

    Xg2  g2#VDD  g2#VSS  g2#A  g2#Y  INVXL

    .ENDS

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Quek
    Quek over 13 years ago

    Hi BraveHeart

    Actually Ultrasim is a fastspice simulator, it does not interprete verilog codes. Our mixed signal simulator AMS Designer will be able to do that. You will need to add spice description of the standard cell netlist as one of the model files.

    Best regards
    Quek

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • BraveHeart
    BraveHeart over 13 years ago

     Hi Quek,

    Thanks for the post. Actually I have not used AMS before. Before AMS people were doing mixed signal post-layout simulations using ultrasimVerilog, so i should be able to do that as well. I tried with ultrasimverilog and spectreverilog to carryout postlayout simulations but i am getting following errors.

    The design doesnot have any interface nets connecting analog and digital components,...... 

    I have sucessfully done mixed signal simulations before but this time i am performing postlayout simulations. In the Hierarchy Editor i have selected av_extracted view of inverter, which is analog view, the simulator fails to identify any digital part in the netlist, thats why it give the above error regarding interface nets.

    My question specifically is; How should i use ultrasimVerilog to do postlayout simulations; In HE i need to select av_extracted view, (By the way i also used options -> Mixed signal options -> digital delays -> use existiung layout and provide the dpf file there) but then, there is no digital, hence no mixed-signal, therefore an error occurs while netlist is compile. How do i tell the simulator to take av_extracted view for detailed parasitics and use verilog/functional view of INVXL???

    I would really appreciate your kind support since i am badly struck in this quagmire.

    Best regards,

    Moaaz

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information