• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. make it clearly beta and betaeff

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13
  • Subscribers 127
  • Views 36707
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

make it clearly beta and betaeff

imagesensor123
imagesensor123 over 13 years ago

 Hi,

    these days i am doing some circuit simulation, and i got confused by beta and betaeff? according to the simple hand calculation equation id=1/2uCoxW/L(Vgs-Vth)^2 or id=1/2beta(Vgs-Vth)^2  or the others. and after simultion, i use the result->print->operation point and i found a betaeff parameter, i think it shold be same with beta, but after calculation id, i found the id(betaeff) is just a half of the id(beta), and how do you calculate the drain current id in saturation region?

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    First of all, I'm assuming you're talking about the drain current with the devices in saturation - so are they in saturation? Secondly this is dependent upon the model - those simple equations break down for modern devices and modern models are more accurate. The documentation covers the details of the equations used. I would expect that for low level models (e.g. mos3) the equation you have will be a reasonable approximation, but it may not be for bsim4 (say) - but only in the saturation region. Thirdly, why not get the simulator to tell you the id rather than trying to work it out yourself?

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    First of all, I'm assuming you're talking about the drain current with the devices in saturation - so are they in saturation? Secondly this is dependent upon the model - those simple equations break down for modern devices and modern models are more accurate. The documentation covers the details of the equations used. I would expect that for low level models (e.g. mos3) the equation you have will be a reasonable approximation, but it may not be for bsim4 (say) - but only in the saturation region. Thirdly, why not get the simulator to tell you the id rather than trying to work it out yourself?

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information