• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. CDB2OA Dropping Layers

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 13109
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CDB2OA Dropping Layers

LanceT
LanceT over 12 years ago

Has anyone run into a problem with cdb2oa dropping layers when converting a cdb library to oa?  When I use the tool, it seems to convert the "drawing" purpose layers OK but not our "mk" layers.  There is no error or warning in the log file and everything appears to have been converted properly but when I look at the layout, the marker layers are not there.  The layers are in the LSW (for OA) and they are set to valid/visible/selectable.  I have also confirmed that the layers exist in the CDB database.  I know I am probably just doing something funky but I don't have a clue what it is that I am doing wrong.  To the best of my knowledge, I believe I have followed the steps defined in section 4 of the "CDB to OpenAccess Translator User Guide" correctly.  Has anyone else had a problem like this and if so, what was the cause and the cure?

  • Cancel
  • berndfi
    berndfi over 12 years ago

     I have seen such thing, but it's more then 4 years back since I did my last conversion.

    Check if there are some layers in your OA database which have either the layer name or the purpose "unknown".

    I can't remmeber to what the layers have been assigned to, also I don't know if the "unkown" was in small or capital letters.

    Best is to filter your shapes for the layer name or lpp throug SKILL.

    If you find such a layer in the OA db check if the shape is the same as the layer your missing form CDB. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • LanceT
    LanceT over 12 years ago

    Thank you for the response.  We were actually able to figure out the problem.  We had created the tech layer information manually (without using CDB2OA to convert the tech file).  When we did that we were defining one of the pre-defined purposes to a different number from what OA recognizes as the default.  This resulted in a conflict and apparently, that purpose and all subsequent purpose definitions were ignored.  Once the tech layer definitions were corrected, we were able to convert the layouts with all layers intact.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information