• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Plotting Gm vs Vgs for different values of Vbs

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 24121
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Plotting Gm vs Vgs for different values of Vbs

wgtkan
wgtkan over 11 years ago
I would like to plot Gm vs. Vgs for different value of Vbs.

Here is what I did. I performed DC sweep on Vgs and then plotted the drain current vs Vgs and then carried out derivative of ID with respect to VGS using the calculator, i.e derv(IS(drain)) to obtain GM. Then performed a parametric analysis of different values of Vbs.

Then when I did hand calculation, the result doesn’t match.

I read on this forum that first I have to do parametric analysis of Vgs and then go to ADE and tools > result browser >dc OPInfo then plot gm but it only plots one Gm vs Vgs not at different Vbs. What am I doing wrong?

I have found a tedious method where I plot Gm vs Vgs for different values of Vbs by plotting them one by one meaning I plot Gm vs Vgs at one value of Vbs and then add it to the table, then I do the same for the next.

My version is IC6.1.6-64b.500.2.1
  • Gm_Vgs.png
  • View
  • Hide
  • Cancel
Parents
  • fatcat1206
    fatcat1206 over 8 years ago
    Hi Maaz

    I experience the similar situation once, and it turned out to be the structure of the model.
    For some processes, the model files have been tuned by the modeling group inside my company.
    They add one wrapper around the original model to improve accuracy, or do something they need.

    Thus for the save command, this extra layer should be introduced.
    In my case "save M0.m1:gm".

    You may consult the modeling group in your company to see whether this situation is applied to you.

    Best Regards

    Yi
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • fatcat1206
    fatcat1206 over 8 years ago
    Hi Maaz

    I experience the similar situation once, and it turned out to be the structure of the model.
    For some processes, the model files have been tuned by the modeling group inside my company.
    They add one wrapper around the original model to improve accuracy, or do something they need.

    Thus for the save command, this extra layer should be introduced.
    In my case "save M0.m1:gm".

    You may consult the modeling group in your company to see whether this situation is applied to you.

    Best Regards

    Yi
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information