• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. AbstractBlockageCoverLayers on not flatten memory insta...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 14294
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

AbstractBlockageCoverLayers on not flatten memory instance

samung
samung over 11 years ago
Hello,

I would like to understand better the AbstractBlockageCoverLayers function in Abstract generator Tool, step Abstract (Blockage).

absSetBinOption("Core" "AbstractBlockageCoverLayers" "M1 M2X M3X ")


Actually, I would like to define some blockages, let's say I have my "memory instance" layout up to MX, so it means the vdd/vss are in MX, but there are some layers from M1 to MX-1 in the "memory instance". 
The access pins are located at the edges of the "memory instance".

I would like to generate an ABSTRACT view as follow : "cover blockage" for M1 to MX-1 and "Detailed Blocakge" for MX.


When I generate the ABSTRACT view, I just have : the MX layer, I don't have the other Metal cover layers.

My input : the "memory instance" layout up to MX (meaning that with Virtuoso Layout Eiditng, i see all the metal layers), but the "memory instance" is not flatten (meaning that it is made of different cells : array_blxxx cell, master control cell ...).


So, do I have to do a flatten of all the "memory instance" cells to be able to generate the different metal cover layers in the ABSTRACT view or is there another way ?

Thanks !!

P.
 
PS :
 
tool version : IC6.1.5-64b.500.9
xxx/cadence_amsams2010.2c_mmsim/lnx/tools/dfII/bin/abstract 
  • Cancel
Parents
  • samung
    samung over 11 years ago
    Hello Colin,

    you were right regarding the "Block" attribute. 

    With this setting in the abstract.record :
    absSetBinOption("Block" "AbstractBlockageDetailedLayers" "M3X ")
    absSetBinOption("Block" "AbstractBlockageCoverLayers" "M1 M2X")

    I have my LEF file generated from Abstarct generator Tool with :
    absSetOption("ExportLEFFile" "test2.lef")
    absExportLEF()
     
    OBS
        LAYER M1 ;
          RECT 0 0 34 19.1 ;
        LAYER M2X ;
          RECT 0 0 34 19.1 ;
        LAYER M3X ;
          RECT 0 184.625 34 189.125 ;
          RECT 0 179.425 34 183.925 ;
          ...
          RECT 0 29.005 34 33.505 ;
          RECT 0 22.505 34 27.005 ;
          RECT 0 17.305 34 21.805 ;
      END
     
    NB : of course, i have changed the sizes of the layers in the copy-paste here, to write this request here.
     
    So I have what I want in the LEF, regarding teh OBSTRUCTION with the cover layers. However, the ABSTRACT view, just contain the last metal layer for the power/ground and does'nt contain the cover layers. It has also the PR boundary (this one was already in the input layout view, so I didn't regenerate it). 
     
    Would you know why the 2 views : ABSTRACT and LEF are not consistent regarding the cover layers ?
     
    Thanks a lot !
     
    P. 
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • samung
    samung over 11 years ago
    Hello Colin,

    you were right regarding the "Block" attribute. 

    With this setting in the abstract.record :
    absSetBinOption("Block" "AbstractBlockageDetailedLayers" "M3X ")
    absSetBinOption("Block" "AbstractBlockageCoverLayers" "M1 M2X")

    I have my LEF file generated from Abstarct generator Tool with :
    absSetOption("ExportLEFFile" "test2.lef")
    absExportLEF()
     
    OBS
        LAYER M1 ;
          RECT 0 0 34 19.1 ;
        LAYER M2X ;
          RECT 0 0 34 19.1 ;
        LAYER M3X ;
          RECT 0 184.625 34 189.125 ;
          RECT 0 179.425 34 183.925 ;
          ...
          RECT 0 29.005 34 33.505 ;
          RECT 0 22.505 34 27.005 ;
          RECT 0 17.305 34 21.805 ;
      END
     
    NB : of course, i have changed the sizes of the layers in the copy-paste here, to write this request here.
     
    So I have what I want in the LEF, regarding teh OBSTRUCTION with the cover layers. However, the ABSTRACT view, just contain the last metal layer for the power/ground and does'nt contain the cover layers. It has also the PR boundary (this one was already in the input layout view, so I didn't regenerate it). 
     
    Would you know why the 2 views : ABSTRACT and LEF are not consistent regarding the cover layers ?
     
    Thanks a lot !
     
    P. 
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information