• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Assura LVS errors

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 13234
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Assura LVS errors

RFStuff
RFStuff over 11 years ago

 Dear All,

 We are switchig to ASSURA (sub-version 4.1_USR4_HF3) from CALIBR.

But we are seeing following errors in LVS log file. These errors were NOT shown by CALIBRE.

1:-
Executing: nnbdif = geomButtOnly(nsd ptap diffNet)
errorLayer(nnbdif " nsd/ptap butting issue: nsd/ptap need to be connected by metal and contact")

2:-
Executing: ppbdif = geomButtOnly(psd ntap diffNet)
errorLayer(ppbdif " psd/ntap butting issue: psd/ntap need to be connected by metal and contact")

3:-
Executing: ptap99 = geomAvoiding(geomGetNet(ptap PWR1 PWR2) geomOr(CSYMBOL DSYMBOL BJTSY...
errorLayer(ptap99 "ptap is wrongly connected to POWER ! ")
4:-
Executing: ntap99 = geomAvoiding(geomGetNet(ntap GND1 GND2) geomOr(CSYMBOL DSYMBOL BJTSY...
errorLayer(ntap99 "ntap is wrongly connected to GROUND ! ")

 

Can anybody please tell what are the causes of these errors.

 

Kind Regatrds,

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    Given that these will be specific to the particular rules you're using, it's hard to know precisely what the issue is and why there is a discrepancy. I'm sure there's a difference in the implementation of the two rule sets for the two different tools, and you'd have to ask the foundry that provided the rules for guidance about the discrepancy.

    I would however check the errors because it would appear that it thinks there is some issue with your well and substrate taps.

    Other than that, giving advice here without being able to see the layout or knowing the precise rule deck you're using is going to be pretty hard!

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information