• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. How to find correlation parameter between two layout devices...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 14022
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to find correlation parameter between two layout devices?

jagadishdn
jagadishdn over 11 years ago

I have done schematic and layout of its design in layout XL. I use cadence 6.1.5 and UMC 90nm technology library. For a mismatch analysis I will be doing monte carlo simulation.

I have to understand that ADE XL asssumes the correlation coefficient cc = 0. But typically a statement is added to netlist file to indicate cc = 0.75. Matching could be improved by employing careful design techniques. Assuming that one follows such techniques, then the cc has be close to 1. My question here is, how do we know the cc between two transistors from the layout tool. Please suggest me how to find the cc.

Thanks

Jagadish

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    ADE XL doesn't assume anything - it's spectre that will assume the mismatch parameters on the devices are not correlated. Note that sometimes foundries produce mismatch models which give the remaining variation assuming good match - so you need to check how the foundry have produced the models.

    In ADE XL you can actually add a constraint to tell it the correlation coefficient for a particular mismatch parameter between two devices (using the constraint manager). Having done that, ADE XL will netlist (for spectre) the correlation coefficient for the simulator to use.

    However, the main challenge is identifying what that value should be. You can tell spectre which parameters are correlated for a pair of devices and what the correlation coefficient should be. The challenge is that you really need to know which of the parameters might be correlated and sometimes they don't have a direct physical meaning. 

    I think the only way of knowing this would be to have some guidance from the foundry on measurements they've made (or potentially measurements you've made on a test chip) - directly going from layout structures to correlation coefficients is pretty difficult for most people  As I said, you also need to know what assumptions (if any) the foundry has made when producing the monte carlo mismatch models.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    ADE XL doesn't assume anything - it's spectre that will assume the mismatch parameters on the devices are not correlated. Note that sometimes foundries produce mismatch models which give the remaining variation assuming good match - so you need to check how the foundry have produced the models.

    In ADE XL you can actually add a constraint to tell it the correlation coefficient for a particular mismatch parameter between two devices (using the constraint manager). Having done that, ADE XL will netlist (for spectre) the correlation coefficient for the simulator to use.

    However, the main challenge is identifying what that value should be. You can tell spectre which parameters are correlated for a pair of devices and what the correlation coefficient should be. The challenge is that you really need to know which of the parameters might be correlated and sometimes they don't have a direct physical meaning. 

    I think the only way of knowing this would be to have some guidance from the foundry on measurements they've made (or potentially measurements you've made on a test chip) - directly going from layout structures to correlation coefficients is pretty difficult for most people  As I said, you also need to know what assumptions (if any) the foundry has made when producing the monte carlo mismatch models.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information