• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Problem with MOS Bulk Routing Parasitic Resistance Extr...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 18023
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Problem with MOS Bulk Routing Parasitic Resistance Extraction

Stepan
Stepan over 10 years ago

Hi,

During the Spectre netlist generation process, I have found out that the Assura QRC extractor includes the parasitic resistances of the MOS transistor bulk routing in the extraction view:

rg58 (vdda \5\:vdda) resistor r=24.5376 c=0

But, it skips connecting this parasitic resistor to the bulk of the transistor:

M10 (\3\:vout \5\:nclk \2\:vin vdda) p_lv_18_mm w=1.92e-06 l=2.4e-07 ad=2.224e-13 as=2.224e-13 pd=2.0u ps=2.0u m=(1)*(1)

From the line above, you can see that it circumvents the parasitic resistor and connects the bulk directly to the polarization net vdda (NOT \5\:vdda)

As a result, the simulation netlist generated from this extracted view is also incorrect.

 

I have tried two different technologies with two different design kits and both have the same issue. Two kits are:

1. Virtuoso Design Environment version IC6.1.3.500.13 with Cadence Extraction QRC - Parasitic Extractor - Version 8.1.4-p002.

2. Virtuoso Design Environment version IC6.1.5-64b.500.132 with Cadence Extraction QRC - Parasitic Extractor - Version 11.1.2-p106.


Is there any way to fix this problem? Can it be done by modifying the configuration script or updating the kit?

Thanks,

Stepan.

  • Cancel
Parents
  • RobinCommander
    RobinCommander over 8 years ago
    p.s.
    I tried the latest QRC (16.1.1-s111) and the R extraction results were the same as 14.2.0 - some connections to sub-nodes of vdd/vss were repeated even though the devices were physically seperated.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • RobinCommander
    RobinCommander over 8 years ago
    p.s.
    I tried the latest QRC (16.1.1-s111) and the R extraction results were the same as 14.2.0 - some connections to sub-nodes of vdd/vss were repeated even though the devices were physically seperated.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information