• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. same schematic and analysis - different results?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 8
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 4992
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

same schematic and analysis - different results?

JorisLambrecht
JorisLambrecht over 10 years ago

Hello all,


I' ve experienced a strange problem: I copied an original schematic  via the Library Manager and copied the corresponding

ADE L states myself (in the .artist_states folder). I then simulate this copy of the schematic with the copy of the state,

but I get a different output than in the case of the original schematic+state, even for a DC analysis?

All variables are set to the same values.

It is probably hard to point out the problem based on this information, but I guess I am making a beginner's mistake somewhere? (Although I've done this before and then everything worked.)

Kind regards,

Joris

  • Cancel
Parents
  • JorisLambrecht
    JorisLambrecht over 10 years ago

    Hello all,


    the input.scs files are identical (apart from the  version number).

    One version simulates correctly, the other one does not simulate at all (neither pss or tran ...)

    The problem lies in a quarter wavelength transmission line (an mtline-component and an s2p-file (the s-parameters

    were generated in another simulator)). In the original schematic, no errors occur.

    In the copied schematic, it does not converge:


    Warning from spectre during initial setup.
        WARNING (CMI-2504): I75: Diagonal elements of G matrix should be positive.

    ...

    Warning from spectre during IC analysis, during periodic steady state analysis `pss'.
        WARNING (SPECTRE-223): Detected NaN at node I75:t_ib2_1.

    Kind regards,

    Joris

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • JorisLambrecht
    JorisLambrecht over 10 years ago

    Hello all,


    the input.scs files are identical (apart from the  version number).

    One version simulates correctly, the other one does not simulate at all (neither pss or tran ...)

    The problem lies in a quarter wavelength transmission line (an mtline-component and an s2p-file (the s-parameters

    were generated in another simulator)). In the original schematic, no errors occur.

    In the copied schematic, it does not converge:


    Warning from spectre during initial setup.
        WARNING (CMI-2504): I75: Diagonal elements of G matrix should be positive.

    ...

    Warning from spectre during IC analysis, during periodic steady state analysis `pss'.
        WARNING (SPECTRE-223): Detected NaN at node I75:t_ib2_1.

    Kind regards,

    Joris

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information