• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. How to preserve parasitic nodes in extracted spice netlist...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 4839
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to preserve parasitic nodes in extracted spice netlist with APS++/parasitic reduction

twen
twen over 9 years ago

I am using APS++ and parasitic reduction to speed up the simulation so the simulation can run to completion within hours.  Some cells in the config are bound to the extracted spice netlists. I manually save the node voltages inside the extracted spice netlists which are located on selected points on certain metal layers when I run the simulation by including the save statements. When I enabled the parasitic reduction, most saved nodes are blown away so I can not probe the internal parasitic nodes. There is an "instance preservation" option and I have used it with limited success. I say "limited success" because I have thousands or more nodes to save and I have to go into the netlist and find the instance names corresponding to the node names. This is not practical unless I build my own parser which reads in the saved nodes and outputs the preserved instances. Here is the version information "@(#)$CDS: virtuoso version 6.1.6-64b 12/07/2015 20:18 (sjfbm186) $."

My question now: is there an option or trick to force the parasitic reduction algorithm to mark and preserve the nodes and instances if these nodes or instances are in the save statement or match the save wild card patterns? Unmarked parasitic nodes and instances can still be trimmed to speed up the simulation.

Thank you in advance,

TJ

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 9 years ago

    You might be being stymied by the dangling resistor removal in APS. Not sure. Given that you're using a recent version, I'd suggest contacting customer support so that we can explore this in more detail to find out why it's not working or if there's a workaround (maybe you can share the example that has the problem which would make it quicker to reproduce).

    Thanks,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 9 years ago

    You might be being stymied by the dangling resistor removal in APS. Not sure. Given that you're using a recent version, I'd suggest contacting customer support so that we can explore this in more detail to find out why it's not working or if there's a workaround (maybe you can share the example that has the problem which would make it quicker to reproduce).

    Thanks,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information