• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. tdnoise or pnoise?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 14865
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

tdnoise or pnoise?

PeppeW90
PeppeW90 over 8 years ago

Hi,

I'm simulating a test bench consisting of a crystal oscillator, followed by several inverter stages that act as buffers.

I want to simulate the phase noise at the output of the last buffer, and eventually see how the added buffers contribute to the total phase noise.

What is the most accurate analysis to do in this case? PSS+PNOISE(sources option) or PSS+PNOISE(timedomain option)?

I don't want to see the integrated jitter or the noise in V^^2/Hz, but the phase noise at the output of the last buffer.

Thanks

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 8 years ago

    The main issue is that you're not really getting phase noise. You're getting the output noise in dBc. Given that I doubt you have significant AM noise, it's probably fine - but we've cleaned things up so that you know you're definitely getting phase noise (i.e. just the PM part of the noise). It's been this way for years - and provided that you knew that the output was not really phase noise, it was fine. Oscillators (even with the buffers afterwards) tend to be dominated by PM noise because the amplitude is limited, so it's pretty safe, I'd say.

    Still, for the avoidance of doubt - if you can try the newer versions, I would - you can always compare the results!

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 8 years ago

    The main issue is that you're not really getting phase noise. You're getting the output noise in dBc. Given that I doubt you have significant AM noise, it's probably fine - but we've cleaned things up so that you know you're definitely getting phase noise (i.e. just the PM part of the noise). It's been this way for years - and provided that you knew that the output was not really phase noise, it was fine. Oscillators (even with the buffers afterwards) tend to be dominated by PM noise because the amplitude is limited, so it's pretty safe, I'd say.

    Still, for the avoidance of doubt - if you can try the newer versions, I would - you can always compare the results!

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information