• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Liberate Characterization Error (removal_rising/fall) for...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 0
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 664
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Liberate Characterization Error (removal_rising/fall) for Sequential Cells

anurans
anurans over 6 years ago
Hi All,
When characterizing a custom made D-flip flop at nominal conditions (1.2V/25C), Liberate runs into following error :
ERROR (LIB-52): The constraint search failed to find a solution within the search range for arc of cell:'UTDFRQ1RVT', r_pin:'CK', r_pin dir:'r', pin:'RB', pin dir:'r', type:'removal_rising rise_constraint' when: D, GLITCH_PROBE. This cell will be marked as failed and the constraint data will be set to: 1.0 (see constraint_failed_value). To debug, review the saved simulation results for deck: removal_27. Possible causes include: 'constraint_glitch_peak' too small; 'constraint_check_final_state_threshold' too large; estimated search range too small (see constraint_search_bound). Modify the constraint parameters and rerun.
ERROR (LIB-52): The constraint search failed to find a solution within the search range for arc of cell:'UTDFRQ1RVT', r_pin:'CK', r_pin dir:'f', pin:'RB', pin dir:'r', type:'removal_falling rise_constraint' when: D, GLITCH_PROBE. This cell will be marked as failed and the constraint data will be set to: 1.0 (see constraint_failed_value). To debug, review the saved simulation results for deck: removal_29. Possible causes include: 'constraint_glitch_peak' too small; 'constraint_check_final_state_threshold' too large; estimated search range too small (see constraint_search_bound). Modify the constraint parameters and rerun.
Although the mentioned constraint parameters were slightly adjusted (constraint_glitch_peak = 0.5, constraint_check_final_state_threshold = 0.3 to 0.7, constraint_search_bound = 1e-9), the issue seems to persist. Could this be due to a bug in the Liberate version ? Current version we have is LIBERATE_16.14.122.
Thanks in advance
Anuradha   
  • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information