• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. How to increase X axis and Y axis limit in layout

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 5935
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to increase X axis and Y axis limit in layout

FormerMember
FormerMember over 6 years ago

HI all,

          While creating layouts I am getting the following error

\w *WARNING* (DB-270547): The coordinate 2.14907e+09 is over the max 2.14748e+09 and 2.14748e+09 is used. . I am not able to place any instances beyond that limit  Is there any option to increase the limit of the coordinates.

I tried using envSetVal("layout" "checkLargeCoordinates" 'boolean nil)

I am using Cadnece Virtuoso 6.1.7-64b .

Regards

Lakshmisha KC

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 6 years ago

    Hi Lakshmisha,

    Why would you want to increase the limit of the coordinates? If you have a technology database with a "DBUperUU" (database unit per user unit) of 1000 (fairly standard for small geometry designs), that gives a database resolution of 1nm, and a maximum coordinate of +/-2.147 metres. Is that not big enough?

    That environment variable is specifically to do with the copy command - even then, the database cannot possibly place an instance beyond 2**31 (plus and minus) times the database resolution because the coordinates are stored as a pair of 32 bit integers in the database.

    I don't understand why you'd need to place a instance at such a large coordinate. The only thing I can think of is if you are creating something such as large panel displays, in which case it makes no sense to have 1nm resolution in the database (so you should be having a smaller DBUperUU; if DBUperUU was 10, then that would allow up to 200 metres or so as the maximum coordinate in each direction). I know of no manufacturing process that has a range of dimensions with a scale of 1 billion between the smallest dimension and the largest dimension.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • FormerMember
    FormerMember over 6 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    HI Andrew ,

          Thanks for the quick reply . I was trying to create an abutment for standard cell layouts . So while instantiating cells it was going beyond 2.147 meters. I have updated my script to limit the placement within 2.147 meters.

    Regards

    Lakshmisha KC

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • zlkeavndwv
    zlkeavndwv over 6 years ago

    We have seen the same message. However we are only trying to open to view a layout. The whole virtuoso session hangs and the log file shows the following,

    \# Memory report: using       5,758 MB, process size 6,761 MB at UTC 2019.06.18 20:13:06.424
    \# Memory report: using       5,858 MB, process size 6,861 MB at UTC 2019.06.18 20:13:37.241
    \# Memory report: using       5,959 MB, process size 6,962 MB at UTC 2019.06.18 20:14:03.356
    \# Memory report: using       6,071 MB, process size 7,074 MB at UTC 2019.06.18 20:14:30.331
    \# Memory report: using       6,184 MB, process size 7,187 MB at UTC 2019.06.18 20:14:57.366

    And it keeps increasing.

    Other layout in the same library opens fine.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 6 years ago in reply to zlkeavndwv

    I'm not sure the message is related to the memory growth. Without seeing the data (e.g. via customer support) it's rather hard to tell. I suggest you do that (contact customer support)

    In the meantime, you could check your data using:

    oaScan -lib libName -cell cellName -view viewName

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • zlkeavndwv
    zlkeavndwv over 6 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    It turns out, one of the cell 6 levels down in hierarchy is somehow corrupted. oaScan says ArrayInst has inverted bBox. I used osScan to repair the cellview and the problem went away.

    Thanks, Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information