• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. QRC: extraction fails due to ports names including the ...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 1889
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

QRC: extraction fails due to ports names including the "+" character

dontpanic
dontpanic over 6 years ago

Hi! The QRC extraction of various cells is failing due to them having port names that use the "+" character. For example, In the QRC log file I get:

+ERROR (LBMISC-215479): at "agds2rcx": syntax error in file /path/to/my/svdb/my_cellname.ports because of an invalid character '+' at line 12

(and in the my_cellname.ports file I see that line corresponds to the entry associated to a port named "clock_latch_N+1").

Is is possible to make PVS/QRC support these port names with the "+" character? We have many cells affected by this, so we'd like to avoid the pain/risk of changing them now (tapeout time).

Thanks and regards, Jorge.

  • Cancel
  • Quek
    Quek over 6 years ago

    Hi Jorge

    "+" is not a legal character in spice so even if the extraction succeeds, the generated spice netlist may also create error during simulation. It would be best for you to rename the port. E.g. clock_latch_Np1


    Best regards
    Quek

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • dontpanic
    dontpanic over 6 years ago in reply to Quek

    Thanks for your reply, Quek. We normally use the extracted view as output for the extraction (not spice netlists), so in this particular case that probably shouldn't be really be a limitation.

    But if there's just no workaround for this issue, I guess I'll have no other choice than renaming all those ports!

    Thanks and regards, Jorge.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information