Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 3894
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Difference in transient simulation result between HSPICE and SPECTRE for RC oscillator

FormerMember
FormerMember

dear forum members,

I would appreciate it if anyone could help me with the following problem.

When oscillator transient simulation is performed with HSPICE and SPECTER, oscillator settling time differs as shown below.

     

The left figure is the result of HSPICE simulation and the right figure is the result of SPECTRE simulation.
However, even if I perform SPECTRE simulation longer than HSPICE simulation, SPECTRE does not stabilize.

I wonder why the two simulation results are different.
SPECTRE simulation setup is defaults and HSPICE simulation options are as follows.
.options post=3 nomod
+ method=gear nowarn
+ accurate=1
+ measdgt=4
+ probe
Thanks
  • Andrew Beckett
    I’m not as familiar with the settings in HSPICE nowadays, but the “gear2” method typically has some numerical damping, so that can certainly affect the behaviour of circuit simulators when simulating oscillators. I suspect you should set it to “trap” in HSPICE (that’s the default in spectre). You could of course set spectre to use method=gear2only (pick gear2only rather than gear2), but this may give you misleading results.
    It’s quite hard to accurately simulate the settling of an oscillator - you typically want to suppress this numerical damping, and you also may need to force a reasonable number of time steps (say at least 20 points per period of the expected frequency) by using maxstep. That said, I’m not sure that would be necessary here because I’m assuming the oscillator output already has a reasonable number of points.
    It’s difficult to know precisely the issue here without seeing it (you’re only showing the result of a measurement, and not anything else).
    Regards,
    Andrew.

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.