• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. shooting vs. hb

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 14300
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

shooting vs. hb

Karev11
Karev11 over 5 years ago

Hi,

From this link:

community.cadence.com/.../tip-of-the-week-when-to-use-harmonic-balance-engine-vs-shooting-newton-engine

it was recommended to use shooting for circuitry that has sharp transitions, but hb for circuitry that has s-parameters. 

My circuit has a series of buffers (sharp edge) and also s-parameter to reflect some routing so I tried both shooting and harmonic balance.  I did not notice significant difference in pss sim itself, but hb take much less time for noise analysis(i use the same no. of harmonics).  Is there a reason why?

The other observation, is that noise analysis result on the nodes along the chain of buffers are the same between hb and shooting, but for the nodes before and  after sp file, they are quite different.  Since hb is recommended for sp model, does that mean we should trust result from hb instead of shooting?  in other words, it's more an accuracy concern than efficiency ?

thanks,

Kevin

  • Cancel
  • Karev11
    Karev11 over 5 years ago

    One thing I forgot to mention (which is more a correction to original statement),  is that the different noise analysis results are when my sp-model is actually a cascade of 3 lower level sp-models and each one based on extraction of 100um long route.

    However, when sp model is based on extraction of one single 300um long route, no difference in noise analysis result between shooting and hb.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information