• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Different Extracted Capacitance Values of the Same MOM Cap...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 15063
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Different Extracted Capacitance Values of the Same MOM Cap Structures Obtained from Quantus QRC Filed Solver

baltacican87
baltacican87 over 5 years ago

Hello,

 

I am using Virtuoso 6.1.7.

 

I am performing the parasitic extraction of a MOM cap array of 32 caps. I use Quantus QRC and I enable field solver. I select “QRCFS” for field solver type and “High” for field solver accuracy. The unit MOM cap is horizontally and vertically symmetric. The array looks like the sketch below and there are no other structures except the unit caps:

Rationally speaking, the capacitance values of the unit caps should be symmetric with respect to a vertical symmetry axis that is between cap16 and cap17 (shown with dashed red line). For example,

the capacitance of cap1 should be equal to the capacitance of cap32

the capacitance of cap2 should be equal to the capacitance of cap31

etc. as there are no other structures around the caps that might create some asymmetry.

Nevertheless, what I observe is the following after the parasitic extraction:

As it can be seen, the result is not symmetric contrary to what is expected. I should also add that I do not observe this when I perform parasitic extraction with no filed solver.

Why do I get this result? Is it an artifact resulting from the field solver tool (my conclusion was yes but still it must be verified)? If not, how can something like this happen?

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Best regards,

Can

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 5 years ago

    Hi Can,

    I would suggest you contact your account team or customer support. The QRCFS option has been replaced by a newer "Quantus FS" option which has higher accuracy and also has an additional "high_accuracy" mode which increases the accuracy still. The older QRCFS is no longer under active support, so it would make much more sense to migrate to the newer version and newer option. It's possible this might require updates to your licensing, hence my suggestion to contact your account team.

    Kind Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • baltacican87
    baltacican87 over 5 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    Hi Andrew,

    Many thnaks for your response. I will check it with my team and see if I can perform parasitic extraction in "Quantus FS".

    Best regards,

    Can

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 5 years ago in reply to baltacican87

    You can find some more details on this topic in https://www.cadence.com/content/dam/cadence-www/global/en_US/documents/company/Events/CDNLive/Secured/Proceedings/SV/2019/sig/SIG203.pdf

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information