• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Workarounds for Flawed Abut functions

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 12207
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Workarounds for Flawed Abut functions

Cdub
Cdub over 4 years ago

I have experienced a similar problem as this person where the tsabutfunction doesn't work well when the mosfet instance has a multiplier variable greater than 1. The PDK says this is a known issue, there recommendation is to use parallel mosfet's instead. I'm working with 10 parallel mosfet and would rather not place all 10 on the schematic, plus I might change them depending on simulations after layout. I'm wondering if there is a better work around. I have tried to place mosfet's in the layout that haven't been binded to an instance, but I can't figure out how to abut them. Any suggestions?

Thanks!

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 4 years ago

    I would contact the foundry because I can't see a good reason for this.

    A workaround might be to place them in the schematic as M1<0:9> so you don't have to have multiple physical instances in the schematic, but this really should not be necessary. I can't help much more without seeing the actual issue, but if separate instances works then this might solve it.

    Abutment won't really work unless there's a schematic binding, since it wouldn't know what the connectivity is and so know what is a valid target for abutment.

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 4 years ago

    I would contact the foundry because I can't see a good reason for this.

    A workaround might be to place them in the schematic as M1<0:9> so you don't have to have multiple physical instances in the schematic, but this really should not be necessary. I can't help much more without seeing the actual issue, but if separate instances works then this might solve it.

    Abutment won't really work unless there's a schematic binding, since it wouldn't know what the connectivity is and so know what is a valid target for abutment.

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information