• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Strange sharp rise/fall in stb phase plot

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 127
  • Views 2774
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Strange sharp rise/fall in stb phase plot

SpiceMonkey
SpiceMonkey over 3 years ago

Hi Everyone, when simulating the amplifiers that includ current mirror load (diode bias+ current souce), I often meet a strange stb phase plot (figure below):

Sometimes phase rises sharply and sometimes falls sharply, while their magnitude basicaly has no difference.Changing sweep points density, probe location or coner...all these may lead to this "controdictory" result.

Could anyone help explan this phonomeon? thank you!

Spectre 19.1

  • Cancel
Parents
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 3 years ago

    Dear SpiceMonkey,

    SpiceMonkey said:

    Sometimes phase rises sharply and sometimes falls sharply, while their magnitude basicaly has no difference.Changing sweep points density, probe location or coner...all these may lead to this "controdictory" result.

    Could anyone help explan this phonomeon? thank you!

    Let me know if you think I am misreading your plot of magnitude and phase for the two cases you illustrate, but it certainly appears to me that there is a difference in magnitude that may lead to the two corresponding difference loop phase results. Please recall, first of all, that phase changes are far more sensitive to the frequency than magnitude changes. Hence, it is far more likely you find more significant phase changes than magnitude changes as frequency increases. Secondly, examining your magnitude plot around 10 MHz, there appears to be a significant resonance in the blue curve that is not as evident in the red curve. As a result, I might expect a much larger phase shift associated with the blue curve than with the red curve - and that is what you are observing due to the phaseWrapped() function used by the Calculator. Hence, in my opinion - and perhaps ny thoughts are incorrect in your opinion, your phase results are not totally unexpected to me and likely not a simulator issue - but a circuit issue.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 3 years ago

    Dear SpiceMonkey,

    SpiceMonkey said:

    Sometimes phase rises sharply and sometimes falls sharply, while their magnitude basicaly has no difference.Changing sweep points density, probe location or coner...all these may lead to this "controdictory" result.

    Could anyone help explan this phonomeon? thank you!

    Let me know if you think I am misreading your plot of magnitude and phase for the two cases you illustrate, but it certainly appears to me that there is a difference in magnitude that may lead to the two corresponding difference loop phase results. Please recall, first of all, that phase changes are far more sensitive to the frequency than magnitude changes. Hence, it is far more likely you find more significant phase changes than magnitude changes as frequency increases. Secondly, examining your magnitude plot around 10 MHz, there appears to be a significant resonance in the blue curve that is not as evident in the red curve. As a result, I might expect a much larger phase shift associated with the blue curve than with the red curve - and that is what you are observing due to the phaseWrapped() function used by the Calculator. Hence, in my opinion - and perhaps ny thoughts are incorrect in your opinion, your phase results are not totally unexpected to me and likely not a simulator issue - but a circuit issue.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
  • SpiceMonkey
    SpiceMonkey over 3 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Thank you ShanwnLogan. Yeah phase is more sensitive than magnitude. While it's a litty tricky to analysis these zeros/poles which are beyond the GBW. Anyway basically no effect on transient response.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 3 years ago in reply to SpiceMonkey

    The loop gain is almost zero at the frequency where the phase "jumps"; if you do a polar plot of the (complex) loop gain, you will see that the absolute difference between the curves is very small.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • SpiceMonkey
    SpiceMonkey over 3 years ago in reply to Frank Wiedmann

    Thank you Frank.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information