• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Run plan and Monte-Carlo for a calibrated circuit

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 9770
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Run plan and Monte-Carlo for a calibrated circuit

StephanWeber
StephanWeber over 3 years ago

Hi,

in the video  Latest Techniques for Simulating Calibrated Circuits (cadence.com) Frederic Negny gives a good introduction to calibration in Assembler. He also demonstrates Run Plans and MC. However, not Run plan in combination with MC. Is this possible too? Can we e.g. define one run plan entry as MC at room temp and Vdd=Vddnom (for doing the calibration), and a 2nd entry for MC vs T and Vdd (for verification vs environmental corners)? Is calcVal clever enough to match the MC interations? And to share the mismatch in the DUT instances?

Or is this a known limitation?

Bye Stephan

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 3 years ago

    Hi Stephan,

    This certainly should work - but I would have to do some detailed tests to see whether any of the special arguments are needed for calcVal (such as matchParams or ignoreParams) to make it work. I suggest you read the documentation, try it, and if you have problems, contact customer support.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 3 years ago

    Hi Stephan,

    This certainly should work - but I would have to do some detailed tests to see whether any of the special arguments are needed for calcVal (such as matchParams or ignoreParams) to make it work. I suggest you read the documentation, try it, and if you have problems, contact customer support.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 3 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    Dear Stephan,

    StephanWeber said:
    However, not Run plan in combination with MC. Is this possible too? Can we e.g. define one run plan entry as MC at room temp and Vdd=Vddnom (for doing the calibration), and a 2nd entry for MC vs T and Vdd (for verification vs environmental corners)? Is calcVal clever enough to match the MC interations? And to share the mismatch in the DUT instances?

    I believe Andrew's comment is correct if I understand your question properly Stephan!

    Perhaps this Troubleshooting article was one that you initiated, but there is a recent document that details how to run a calibration procedure on a Monte-carlo based netlist at one temperature, and then take the calibrated value(s) from that calibration process and pass it to the following test runwhihc may be, for example, a temperature sweep, using the same Monte-Carlo based netlist. With multiple Monte-carlo runs (and unique calibration value(s) for each), the article indicates the appropriate set of calibration values for a given Monte-Carlo netlist are correctly passed to the sweep using that Monte-Carlo netlist. The article is at the Cadence On-lne support site URL:

    https://support.cadence.com/apex/ArticleAttachmentPortal?id=a1O3w000009bfzvEAA&pageName=ArticleContent

    The Troubleshooting article indicates:

    "Starting IC6.1.8/ICADVM18.1 ISR12, the ?getFirstSweepPoint argument of CalcVal is supported for a setup involving MC with sweeps."

    I hope I correctly understood your question!

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • StephanWeber
    StephanWeber over 3 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Hi Shawn, I managed using getFirstSweepPoint, but I still wonder about run plan and MC and calibration. For my understanding each run plan part is its own MC run, like 1st cal test, then run in calibrated condition. However, how to pass the cal data to the next run plan entry?

    Bye Stephan

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information