• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Transient Noise Simulation gives the same transient results...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 9845
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Transient Noise Simulation gives the same transient results even though the noise spectrum of the noise sources are different.

delgsy
delgsy over 2 years ago

Basically, I want to check the transient noise at VOUT if I provide different noise source (I6).
I used Noise/Freq pairs = 2, 1st pair = 1p*1p@10Hz, 2nd pair = 1p*1p3p*3p@10MHz (left), 2nd pair = 1p*1p3p*3p@100MHz (right).
In transient noise analysis setup, I used Fmax = 100GHz.
Both simulation gives exactly the same results.

What did I miss?
Is there anything that I can try?






  • Cancel
Parents
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 2 years ago

    Dear delgsy,

    delgsy said:
    Basically, I want to check the transient noise at VOUT if I provide different noise source (I6).
    I used Noise/Freq pairs = 2, 1st pair = 1p*1p@10Hz, 2nd pair = 1p*1p@10MHz (left), 2nd pair = 1p*1p@100MHz (right).
    In transient noise analysis setup, I used Fmax = 100GHz.
    Both simulation gives exactly the same results.

    I am really having trouble providing some thoughts on your question and will apologize upfront for that!  Your post leaves me with several questions:

    1. You note you want to check the transient noise at VOUT when you provide different noise sources. However, you have only provided us one of the noise sources which I believe is I6. What is the noise profile of the other source?

    2. Your noise source I6 has the same power density for each breakpoint in frequency. Why not just specify one frequency and its spectral power density will be applied through your noisefmax setting?

    3. As I mentioned in your Forum post yesterday, your simulation time of 1 us will limit the visible noise below 1 MHz. Any differences in the input noise sources spectral density below 1 MHz will not be evident.

    4. You have a very large resistor R0 shown as 1e9 ohm and a parallel capacitor C0 of unknown value. Is R0 noisy? In any case, these two components will filter any noise components with frequencies above 1/(2pi()*R0C0). Hence, your two noise sources are low-pass filtered by the following first-order filters depending on your value of C0:

    Hence, if C0 is 0.1 fF, the transient noise frequencies you are observing have components up to about 1.6 MHz. With only a 1 us sample time, leading to an effective high-pass filter of 1 MHz, you are are only observing noise between about 1 MHz and 1.6 MHz.

    5. Have you examined the spectral density of your output noise? I might suggest you review an effort I recently did to help explain some apparent misunderstandings of a transient noise simulation at URL:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/7vxzliml4uz6518/psd_study_sml_090622v1p1.pdf?dl=0

    and a follow-on to one the Forum poster's questions at URL:

    www.dropbox.com/.../two_sided_one_sided_fft_sml_090922v1p1.pdf

    Perhaps if you have time to either correct my misunderstanding(s) or provide added data, I might be of more help - sorry!

    I have a lot of experience with transient noise simulations and their analysis does require some effort. However, in my experience, with the results have always been explainable and reasonably accurate.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 2 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Dear delgsy,

    It struck me after I wrote my response as I thought about your noise plots and the magnitude of the noise evident in each, that 1 Gohm resistor may indeed be noisy. As such, its noise will dominate the noise you are adding with your noise files. I decided to plot the Johnson noise due to the 1 Gohm resistor and assumed your C0 was 1 fF. Note its magnitude far exceeds the spectral density of the noise you are adding.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 2 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Dear delgsy,

    It struck me after I wrote my response as I thought about your noise plots and the magnitude of the noise evident in each, that 1 Gohm resistor may indeed be noisy. As such, its noise will dominate the noise you are adding with your noise files. I decided to plot the Johnson noise due to the 1 Gohm resistor and assumed your C0 was 1 fF. Note its magnitude far exceeds the spectral density of the noise you are adding.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information