• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Updated PDK Vth Delta

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 7390
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Updated PDK Vth Delta

illaoi
illaoi over 2 years ago

Hi,

On the new PDK (mature) for a given process node, selecting op of a given FET and then Vth shows more than 60% delta (~150mV), foundry verified that they see <1mV delta, this remained a dilemma for us to understand the discrepancy. 

In the netlist the LDE (SA,etc.,) are on, if that helps! I have attached ID-VGS, and gm-VGS, which I do not see that Vth delta!

Any comments are appreciated,

Thanks!

  • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 2 years ago

    Dear illaoi,

    illaoi said:

    On the new PDK (mature) for a given process node, selecting op of a given FET and then Vth shows more than 60% delta (~150mV), foundry verified that they see <1mV delta, this remained a dilemma for us to understand the discrepancy. 

    In the netlist the LDE (SA,etc.,) are on, if that helps! I have attached ID-VGS, and gm-VGS, which I do not see that Vth delta!

    There are a couple of points to consider from my perspective.

    1. The definition of the threshold voltage is not standard. It is necessary to specify exactly how the parameter is measured. Hence, I would initially verify that the conditions you are simulating the parameter have been verified to be identical to those your PDK vendor is using.

    2. Usually, a PDK vendor takes measurements on only specific device sizes. As you know, smaller devices will show greater amounts of threshold variation than larger devices. Hence, please verify that the device you are simulating has the same topology and is the same device type (i..e., low or high threshold, core or I/O device, etc) as was used by your PDK vendor. In your specific case, my guess is your device is much larger than that used by the PDK vendor.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information