• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Quantus Coupled vs Decoupled Parasitic Extraction Resul...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 3230
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Quantus Coupled vs Decoupled Parasitic Extraction Results

Aida
Aida 11 months ago

Hi all,

I extracted the parasitic capacitances of my layout (Charge Pump) using both the coupled and decoupled modes using Quantus Pegasus. The coupled result gives me closer result to the pre-simulation than the decoupled mode. In some of my designs (all charge pumps) the decoupled mode result is significantly lower than the coupled mode result. I am a bit confused because I read that the coupled extraction gives a  more accurate extraction with higher complexity and inclusion of cross coupling while the decoupled mode is against one node (VSS) and less accurate. I am wondering if such case happens or if i am missing some settings on the Quantus Setup? I have also attached a picture of the Quantus setup and extraction menu that I used below .

Thanks

  • Cancel
  • Saloni Chhabra
    Saloni Chhabra 10 months ago

    Hi,

    In both coupled and decoupled modes of extraction, Quantus extracts the coupling caps between the nets. However, in decoupled mode, Quantus removes the parasitic coupling capacitor between two nets (or net nodes), and produces two decoupled caps, attaching one decoupled cap to each of the two nets (or nodes). These decoupled caps are reported to the reference net (VSS in your case), but were actually extracted between signal nets.

    Coupled RC netlists can be slower to simulate, but some sensitive circuits might need coupled cap extraction to yield accurate results. This is probably the case for you. If you are concerned about the results you get with decoupled extraction, please contact Cadence customer support so they can take a closer look at your results.

    Regards,

    Saloni

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Aida
    Aida 10 months ago in reply to Saloni Chhabra

    Thank you for your response! Yes i am concerned about the results because the coupled extraction gave me higher result that matches my pre-extraction simulation while the results from decoupled extraction where significantly lower. I will contact customer support. Thank you!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information