• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. Different PSS and Pnoise result with different Fund and...

Stats

  • Replies 0
  • Subscribers 125
  • Views 834
  • Members are here 0

Different PSS and Pnoise result with different Fund and sample_ratio settings

YutaoLiu
YutaoLiu 3 months ago

Hello everyone,

I am using ADE assembler in IC23.1 to simulation my circuit, which include a 25% dutycycle generator (working frequency is fck) followed with a div-4 (driven by 2 stage clock buffer).

I did two experiments with two different settings on PSS+Pnoise to measure the RJ at the 25% dutycycle generator output (rising-edge). But the PSS time domain waveform and edge phase noise looks different.

1st experiment: div-4 was enabled, set "Fundamental frequency" in PSS as 4*fck, and "sample ratio" in sampled jitter as 4;

2nd experiment: disabled div-4, set "Fundamental frequency" in PSS as fck, and "sample ratio" in sampled jitter as 1;

Based on my understanding, 25% dudycycle generator are driving the same loading in above two experiments and I expect PSS time-domain waveform and edge phase noise at generator's output should be the same in above two experiments.

However, PSS time-domain waveform at the generator output with div-4 disabled has slightly slower rising edge than counterpart of with div-4 enabled.

And in edge phase noise curves, low offset frequency range, noise between two cases is almost the same, but in high frequency range, the different is ~4dB.

I would like to know:

1) How does "sample ratio" work in sampled jitter work to measure Jee or edge phase noise?

2) Any explanation to this difference between above two experiments?

Thanks and regards,

Yutao

,

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information