• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Cell delay estimation for pre route and post route

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 10
  • Subscribers 92
  • Views 16195
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Cell delay estimation for pre route and post route

gops
gops over 16 years ago
How does the encounter estimates cell delay for post route and pre routes. Actually my doubt is about the load capacitance it will take for both the analysis.I think that for pre route it takes the load capacitance as the sum of both net capacitance(in the WLM) and pin capacitance of the driven cell.But for post route which load cpacitance its going to take.Is it the same as pre route OR is it the effective capacitance as seen from the driving pin?
  • Cancel
Parents
  • gops
    gops over 16 years ago
    Hi BobD ;
    Thanks for your reply.I'm a beginner in ASIC design.So i may be wrong sometimes.Anyway i shall tell you my exact problem in a detailed way.
    from your reply i understood that Encounter does not take wireload models for delay calculation.ok thats fine. Then it may be taking the extracted prasitics of trial route during pre route and nanoroute during post route.
     
    I'm having the idea that ;
     
    For calculating the delay for a cell two things are considered
    1) input slew
    2) output load.
     
    In the sdf file , i have seen both interconnect delay as well as cell delay. You told that the extracted net parasitic will be added to the input pin cap of driven cell to calculate cell delay. So it means that you have already considered the delay of the interconnect to calculate cell delay , is'nt it?If thats the case what is the need of calculating the interconnect delay once more?
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • gops
    gops over 16 years ago
    Hi BobD ;
    Thanks for your reply.I'm a beginner in ASIC design.So i may be wrong sometimes.Anyway i shall tell you my exact problem in a detailed way.
    from your reply i understood that Encounter does not take wireload models for delay calculation.ok thats fine. Then it may be taking the extracted prasitics of trial route during pre route and nanoroute during post route.
     
    I'm having the idea that ;
     
    For calculating the delay for a cell two things are considered
    1) input slew
    2) output load.
     
    In the sdf file , i have seen both interconnect delay as well as cell delay. You told that the extracted net parasitic will be added to the input pin cap of driven cell to calculate cell delay. So it means that you have already considered the delay of the interconnect to calculate cell delay , is'nt it?If thats the case what is the need of calculating the interconnect delay once more?
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information