• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Merging two designs

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 13215
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Merging two designs

Shankar P
Shankar P over 16 years ago

 I have two digital modules that have been synthesized and placed and routed. Now I want to join them in SoC encounter, do timing analysis and write out the netlist file. 

 I can rewrite a topmodule verilog file calling the individual designs, resynthesize and reroute. Is there someway to avoid that. Please throw me some light on where to start.

Thanks

Shankar

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Kari
    Kari over 16 years ago

     You could write a top module that calls these two modules as instances (like a hard macro). But then timing could be difficult, because you would need a .lib for each of your pre-existing modules, as well as constraints written that way, and I'm thinking you would rather time flat.

    So, you could still write your top module that includes the two pre-existing modules, make them partitions as if you're doing a top-down hierarchical flow, but you already have the "blocks" built. So you know the size, pin locations, etc. Then you can run assembleDesign (once you have all the data in the right place) which will flatten your completed blocks with your top-level. Then you can run your flat timing and output a flat netlist. It's kind of using the top-down flow backwards, but I think it will work.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Kari
    Kari over 16 years ago

     You could write a top module that calls these two modules as instances (like a hard macro). But then timing could be difficult, because you would need a .lib for each of your pre-existing modules, as well as constraints written that way, and I'm thinking you would rather time flat.

    So, you could still write your top module that includes the two pre-existing modules, make them partitions as if you're doing a top-down hierarchical flow, but you already have the "blocks" built. So you know the size, pin locations, etc. Then you can run assembleDesign (once you have all the data in the right place) which will flatten your completed blocks with your top-level. Then you can run your flat timing and output a flat netlist. It's kind of using the top-down flow backwards, but I think it will work.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information