• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. CTS with MMMC

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 15191
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CTS with MMMC

SINGI
SINGI over 16 years ago

HI

 

I am working with 40nm TSMC library, according to adavanced chip implementation tech., CTS needs the following:

Clock routing with 2X width and 2X spacing.

Include double Via and clock sheilding.

 I cld succussfullly  get 2X spacing, and shielding but have prbs with 2X width and vias.  According to cadence soc encounter manual, I can use NONDEFAULTRULE to  CTS 2 use wide wires and for this I need to put in the lef files, the 2X width. But wen i try to run CTS, i have the following errors and tools crashes.(i use setCTSMode -routeNonDefaultRule widenwires)

 


globalDetailRoute

#Start globalDetailRoute on Thu Aug 13 15:19:22 2009
#
#cpu time = 00:00:00, elapsed time = 00:00:00, memory = 1942.00 (Mb)
#WARNING (NRDB-411) spacing table for LAYER M1 is already defined. Ignore this one.
#WARNING (NRFL-333) line 106: edge checked min area rule already exists. Cannot overwrite it with a new one. Ignore the new one.
#WARNING (NRDB-411) spacing table for LAYER M2 is already defined. Ignore this one.
#WARNING (NRFL-333) line 192: edge checked min area rule already exists. Cannot overwrite it with a new one. Ignore the new one.
#WARNING (NRDB-411) spacing table for LAYER M3 is already defined. Ignore this one.
#WARNING (NRFL-333) line 277: edge checked min area rule already exists. Cannot overwrite it with a new one. Ignore the new one.
#WARNING (NRDB-411) spacing table for LAYER M4 is already defined. Ignore this one.
#WARNING (NRFL-333) line 362: edge checked min area rule already exists. Cannot overwrite it with a new one. Ignore the new one.

 

please let me know solution.

 Thank you 

 Sing 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • SINGI
    SINGI over 16 years ago

    Hi Kari

    Thanks a lot for the reply. I have no probs with LEF(followed ur reply) . After routing I can see in the layout many of the clock nets are routed with Shielding, but not all the clock nets, I think its because there are no  neighbouring nets for XTalk effect so only the nets with possible Xtalk are shielded with VSS.

    most of my problems are solved now. I wll come back if thre are any moer.

     

     

    Sing 

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • SINGI
    SINGI over 16 years ago

    Hi Kari

    Thanks a lot for the reply. I have no probs with LEF(followed ur reply) . After routing I can see in the layout many of the clock nets are routed with Shielding, but not all the clock nets, I think its because there are no  neighbouring nets for XTalk effect so only the nets with possible Xtalk are shielded with VSS.

    most of my problems are solved now. I wll come back if thre are any moer.

     

     

    Sing 

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information