Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 92
  • Views 16980
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Scan Reorder issue

Vishnu Chada

We have a scan connection as follows :

               FF1(from Q,SDFF)   -----------BUF ---------------FF2 (to D , DFF)
                                                                                 |
                                                                                 |
                                                                                 ________(to other logic)


Scan def :

+ORDERED
        FF1 ( IN SI ) ( OUT Q )
        FF2  ( IN D ) ( OUT Q )
+FLOATING
         ---
        ---

When i do scan reordering the tool mess with the functional path which is shown in above representation.Connects that entire logic to other flop, which is caught in lec.It does not honor the ORDERED section properly.Is there any known issue where encounter has problem handling Regular Flop (with D input as part of the scan chain) in the ORDERED section instead of a ScanFlop ?

Tried using 7.1 and 8.1USR3.

Appreciate your help.

Regards,
Vishnu

Parents

  • I was able to bypass the above mentioned issue by adding the buffer to the ordered list.But am still facing issue when the scan chain ends it D pin of the flop.

     

    + STOP <instance> D

     Using 8.1 USR3. I think encounter inherently has problem handling scan chains where there is  D pin in the chain instead of SI.

     Would like to know from the user community or cadence personnel if this is true from there previous experiences.

     Appreciate your time.


    Regards,

    Vishnu

Reply

  • I was able to bypass the above mentioned issue by adding the buffer to the ordered list.But am still facing issue when the scan chain ends it D pin of the flop.

     

    + STOP <instance> D

     Using 8.1 USR3. I think encounter inherently has problem handling scan chains where there is  D pin in the chain instead of SI.

     Would like to know from the user community or cadence personnel if this is true from there previous experiences.

     Appreciate your time.


    Regards,

    Vishnu

Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.