• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Clock gating failed with Encounter

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 13051
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Clock gating failed with Encounter

weian
weian over 14 years ago

I was trying to implement my chip using the clock gating low power design feature provided in Encounter. Firstly I turned on the clock gating option in RTL compiler. The tool found all registers that are clock gating applicable and synthesized them with gated clock. Then I simulated the synthesized Verilog netlist using the same test bench for the original Verilog code. The simulation didn't consider any timing information since we were testing the logic integrity. The logic of the synthesized netlist was verified successfully.

The problem happened in place and route. After P&R, I extracted the Verilog netlist of the layout and tried to verify its logic using the same test bench (that I used for behavioral and synthesized Verilog code). The verification failed! I was surprised to see this since the P&R tool is supposed to keep the design function identical to the synthesized netlist.

I re-synthesized and re-place&route the design, but with the clock gating option turned off. This time both the synthesized and post-layout netlists passed the verification.

I tried very hard to debug the clock-gated design by disabling the clock-gating of some components. But it seems that the place&route result is unpredictable.  

Did I miss something when placing and routing the clock-gated design? Or is there special method to verify the post-layout netlist of a clock-gated design?

I'm looking forward to your comments. Thans very much.

 

  • Cancel
  • Kari
    Kari over 14 years ago

     Please file a service request for this issue.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information