• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. how to validate delay change details reported due to cross...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 0
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 12566
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

how to validate delay change details reported due to cross talk effect in spice

deeps
deeps over 14 years ago

 Hi,

   I am trying to validate ETS101USR2 cross talk anlaysis details with that of spice,

        For glitch violations i can pick the victim net and  check the same glitch peak and width in spectre output.

             But for delay change details caused by the cross talk effect, how can i validate the same in spice. How to make sure the delay change reported in incremental SDF created from ETS to be compared in spice.

 

regards

deepak.

  • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information