• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. SOC Encounter :: LEF File load Failed

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13
  • Subscribers 95
  • Views 19908
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SOC Encounter :: LEF File load Failed

Sohaib Qazi
Sohaib Qazi over 13 years ago

Hi

I am using SoC Encounter 10.1. While importing the design I load the netlist file (i.e. *.v file) and then add the LEF file to the list.

When I press OK then I get this error.

**ERROR: (ENCSYT-16013):
/sw/cadence/libraries/cmos065_522-2/CORL65LPSVT_5.1/CADENCE/LEF/
CORL65LPSVT_soc.lef failed

I am unable to resolve this issue.

Any suggestions ?

Thanks,

Qazi

  • Cancel
Parents
  • DavidMZ
    DavidMZ over 13 years ago

     There are no site rows in your design (and also, what are the blocks you say are missing? standard cells? power rings?)

      I still find your tech lef strange. If for example the unit defined is the micron, we see that you have a routing grid with a distance between the routing tracks (defined by the PITCH statement) of 10 microns, even though the default routing width (WIDTH statement) is 0.09 microns. The width can be more of course, but my point is that it seems illogical to allow a so small width with a distance a hundred times more important.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • DavidMZ
    DavidMZ over 13 years ago

     There are no site rows in your design (and also, what are the blocks you say are missing? standard cells? power rings?)

      I still find your tech lef strange. If for example the unit defined is the micron, we see that you have a routing grid with a distance between the routing tracks (defined by the PITCH statement) of 10 microns, even though the default routing width (WIDTH statement) is 0.09 microns. The width can be more of course, but my point is that it seems illogical to allow a so small width with a distance a hundred times more important.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information