• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Cadence Encounter doesn't fix hold violations?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 0
  • Subscribers 90
  • Views 1451
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Cadence Encounter doesn't fix hold violations?

FormerMember
FormerMember over 12 years ago
Hi everyone,
please help me with the next problem:

I'm designing a digital IC based on FPGA-verified source code using Cadence tools: Encounter for P&R and optimization and Incisive simulator (NCSim may be the second name) for checking the resulting waveforms.
After P&R, in post-route stage, I optimized design using the next commands:

optDesign -postRoute
optDesign -postRoute -hold

and the results are:
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Setup mode | all | reg2reg | in2reg | reg2out | in2out | clkgate |
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| WNS (ns):| -0.021 | -0.021 | 0.044 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TNS (ns):| -1.751 | -1.751 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Violating Paths:| 356 | 356 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| All Paths:|3.64e+05 |2.45e+05 |1.19e+05 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Hold mode | all | reg2reg | in2reg | reg2out | in2out | clkgate |
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| WNS (ns):| 0.031 | 0.038 | 0.031 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TNS (ns):| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Violating Paths:| 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| All Paths:|3.64e+05 |2.45e+05 |1.19e+05 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
+--------------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

I know that setup violations were not fixed correctly, but hold were.
After that, I extracted the resulting netlist and SDF file and annotated them to simulator, and there are more timing violations in it's log file, but only HOLD. I think that setup violations were fixed decreasing the clock frequency in testbench, but, of course, HOLD not.

A part of ncsim.log file:
Warning! Timing violation
$setuphold<hold>( posedge CK &&& (ENABLE_RB === 1'b1):3236050 PS, negedge E &&& (ENABLE_RB === 1'b1):3236050 PS, 1.0 : 10 PS, 1.0 : 10 PS );
File: ./uk65lscsp10bbrccs_sdf30.v, line = 33170
Scope: :UUT.bis64.B_E.\tmp_reg[33] 
Time: 3236050 PS


Warning! Timing violation
$setuphold<hold>( posedge CK &&& (ENABLE_RB === 1'b1):3236050 PS, negedge E &&& (ENABLE_RB === 1'b1):3236050 PS, 1.0 : 10 PS, 1.0 : 10 PS );
File: ./uk65lscsp10bbrccs_sdf30.v, line = 33170
Scope: :UUT.bis64.B_E.\tmp_reg[34] 
Time: 3236050 PS

How can I fix hold violations in encounter? What I need to do? Please note, the program says that there are no hold violations in design.

Thanks in advance,
Kuxx.
  • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information