• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. PnR tips, macros placement

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 94
  • Views 16095
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

PnR tips, macros placement

vincentcold
vincentcold over 12 years ago

Hi !

      I'm new to floorplanning, and PnR in industry level. Can someone please help me with some tips from your experience, and where to find useful examples for macros placement, some kind of things you do to prevent congestion, and make your design more robust. Thanks a lot ! 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • fitz
    fitz over 12 years ago

    Unfortunately the answer is "It depends".
    If you are intimate with the circuit you should be able to anticipate the module guide and hence the macro placement based on your knowledge of the data flow.

    If the circuit is completely foreign,  you have a lot of research ahead of you.
    Just to get a plausible start point I generally begin with the EDI automatic floorplan commands planDesign , setPlanDesignMode  and multiPlanDesign.
    Good documentation under  / doc / soceUG / Creating An Initial Floorplan Using Automatic Floorplan Synthesis.html.
    You will notice that planDesign generally places macros toward the periphery, a valid technique because it leaves the central core area free for standard cells.

    If you have hundreds of macros you are going to need the relative floorplan menu "define array constraints"  to simplify your macro positioning.

    The overall strategy  also depends on how many routing layers you have to get over top the macros, if you are forced to go around, congestion is going to be problem.
    The fewer the number of routing layers the closer to the edge they belong.
    With 8-10 interconnect layers your options open up,  IF the macro connected standard cells naturally gravitate toward the center the associated macro  can also be drawn closer to the center .

    It Is going to take time to get right.
    Another trick of the trade is to use trialRoute -noDetour  during your floor planning exercise, if you can solve the congestion problem with low effort routing the final route is going to be easy.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • fitz
    fitz over 12 years ago

    Unfortunately the answer is "It depends".
    If you are intimate with the circuit you should be able to anticipate the module guide and hence the macro placement based on your knowledge of the data flow.

    If the circuit is completely foreign,  you have a lot of research ahead of you.
    Just to get a plausible start point I generally begin with the EDI automatic floorplan commands planDesign , setPlanDesignMode  and multiPlanDesign.
    Good documentation under  / doc / soceUG / Creating An Initial Floorplan Using Automatic Floorplan Synthesis.html.
    You will notice that planDesign generally places macros toward the periphery, a valid technique because it leaves the central core area free for standard cells.

    If you have hundreds of macros you are going to need the relative floorplan menu "define array constraints"  to simplify your macro positioning.

    The overall strategy  also depends on how many routing layers you have to get over top the macros, if you are forced to go around, congestion is going to be problem.
    The fewer the number of routing layers the closer to the edge they belong.
    With 8-10 interconnect layers your options open up,  IF the macro connected standard cells naturally gravitate toward the center the associated macro  can also be drawn closer to the center .

    It Is going to take time to get right.
    Another trick of the trade is to use trialRoute -noDetour  during your floor planning exercise, if you can solve the congestion problem with low effort routing the final route is going to be easy.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information