• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Digital Implementation
  3. Macro Placement Issue with Custom LEF file

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1
  • Subscribers 91
  • Views 14036
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Macro Placement Issue with Custom LEF file

kevinSh
kevinSh over 8 years ago

Hi all,

I have a macro that is essentially a special-via (two metal layers connected through a cut layer). My netlist includes several of these macros as physical-only cells defined in a LEF file with the following class

  CLASS BLOCK ;
  PROPERTY LEF58_CLASS "CLASS COVER FILL ; " ;

I want to place and route the design with these cells in it. Since they are metal-only I want the tool to place them on top of the normal cells and place them in an optimal for delay and congestion position. In the design if I use the standard cell placement to place these macros, it will ignore the blockage in the macros and place them on top of one another. So I use the macroPlacer (planDesign) to preplace them. Using the medium effort it will place them in an array disregarding their proximity to the cells/nets they connect to. If I use the high effort option, it seems to ignore my macroSpacing and minMacrotoCore constraints and keeps placing some outside the core or too close to one another.

I have used various LEF classes, various planDesign constraints, and various planDesign options, using Halos and etc., and nothing seems to work perfectly. Why can't the tool simply understand that there is an internal blockage in the macro on metal 2 and 3 and place them accordingly? 

Is there any way to improve upon this situation? :-( 

Bests,
Kaveh

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Kari
    Kari over 7 years ago

    i don't think CLASS COVER is what you want - it assumes no active devices.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Kari
    Kari over 7 years ago

    i don't think CLASS COVER is what you want - it assumes no active devices.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information