Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 0
  • Subscribers 65
  • Views 13982
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

When to ideally run an UNR Analysis?

sumg

Cadence recommend running the UNR analysis when your code coverage metrics are near 70-95% depending on the size of the design.

RTL and code coverage data are inputs to the formal tool for UNR analysis. Provided RTL is frozen and the test suite is maturing I believe that the better the code coverage metrics

are given as input,  we get two advantages

1. Faster UNR analysis

2. Accurate UNR analysis.

Some folks say that the UNR output shall not change if RTL is stable. I see i get more accurate UNR (Lower numbers), when I do the analysis when my test suite is mature

enough to give good code coverage result.

Kindly share your experiences if you see more accurate result when code coverage data is better.

Thanks in Advance.

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.