• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Functional Verification
  3. Does OVM methodology supports Module based SV

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 13709
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Does OVM methodology supports Module based SV

archive
archive over 18 years ago

Hi..
       we all know that OVM is the open verification methodology introduced by both cadence & mentor by combinig URM +AVM.
        what  I know is OVM has been introduced for  class based systemverilog.

doubt:
          Does OVM supports module based systemverilog or not?


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by raghavendrap
  • Cancel
Parents
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Though the OVM is yet to be really seen outside, I will be surprised if it doesn't. For now you can refer to AVM, it has both. We at CVC recommend it based on the amount of investment one is ready to make. Module based thing gets you started faster, works with existing env etc. Infact we submitted a CDNLive India paper for this year based on a SPI block verification project. If you are in Bangalore we can help you better face-to-face if needed. Drop me an email ajeetha <> gmail.com if interested.

    BTW - adopting a class based methodology your returns are lot higher and if done carefully it can co-exist peacefully with rest of your TB being module based. It may boil down to your tool support for constructs as well.

    Ajeetha, CVC
    www.noveldv.com


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by ajeetha
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • archive
    archive over 18 years ago

    Though the OVM is yet to be really seen outside, I will be surprised if it doesn't. For now you can refer to AVM, it has both. We at CVC recommend it based on the amount of investment one is ready to make. Module based thing gets you started faster, works with existing env etc. Infact we submitted a CDNLive India paper for this year based on a SPI block verification project. If you are in Bangalore we can help you better face-to-face if needed. Drop me an email ajeetha <> gmail.com if interested.

    BTW - adopting a class based methodology your returns are lot higher and if done carefully it can co-exist peacefully with rest of your TB being module based. It may boil down to your tool support for constructs as well.

    Ajeetha, CVC
    www.noveldv.com


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by ajeetha
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information