Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 13476
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CDNLive! 2007: What will YOU be looking out for?

archive

Hi everyone,

Another CDNLive EMEA is just around the corner (Munich, May 14-16). The steering committee and organizers are hard at work picking a well-rounded contribution of technical papers, presentations and other cool stuff. Last year's event was definitely worth the trip to Nice - despite some healthy competition from the World Cup ;-)

I thought it'd be a good idea to start a topic and ask everyone: What will YOU be looking out for at CDNLive (EMEA, SV, the world!) this year wrt verification planning?

  • Technical papers on users' experience with planning methodology ?
  • Hot technologies like IPCM, Trailblazer or uRM ?
  • New product releases like Enterprise Manager 2.x ?
  • Tutorials, training or other face-to-face user discussions ?
My personal favorite will have to be planning and mixed-language environment integration: how do I create one plan and make sure I can track metrics coming in from different sources?

Whatever it is, other users are interested! Let us know!

Happy planning,

-Stelix.


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by stelix
Parents

  • I would eagerly look for uRM, here is a long rationale..

    Thanks
    Ajeetha, CVC
    www.noveldv.com

    I'm not a IUS user as of now, but am rather quite well versed with equivalent methdoologies for Verification using SytemVerilog such as VMM and AVM. Since these two are quite open, I am able to correlate them well and see a similarity and use them nicely. I hope the much talked about uRM will be made open as well - by open I don't mean a "free tool" rather the methodology. I see several benefits for many in doing that:

    • A potential user can look at all methodologies and choose (not by going through evals for whcih usually he/she may not have time for)
    • Independent Verification services companies such as mine (CVC, www.noveldv.com) can promote all methodologies equally and hence gain a wider "market penetration" :-)
    • Several design companies often seek for an independent voice on the methodology, and services companies can now talk about all 3 and if they already use say NCSIM, it may be just better for him to move to uRM. For instance in the last 1 month I met 2 of my potential clients here in Bangalore who use NC and they were looking at SystemVerilog, but I couldn;t talk to them about "effective way to use a vast language such as SV". I only had information on VMM & AVM and the clients finally said, let me call the CDN support to find out about uRM. But later one of them called me up and said due to project pressure he had to drop that idea for now (also he was told that uRM was new, not ready etc.). I wish I had enough info to show him on uRM on that day itself :-)


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by ajeetha
Reply

  • I would eagerly look for uRM, here is a long rationale..

    Thanks
    Ajeetha, CVC
    www.noveldv.com

    I'm not a IUS user as of now, but am rather quite well versed with equivalent methdoologies for Verification using SytemVerilog such as VMM and AVM. Since these two are quite open, I am able to correlate them well and see a similarity and use them nicely. I hope the much talked about uRM will be made open as well - by open I don't mean a "free tool" rather the methodology. I see several benefits for many in doing that:

    • A potential user can look at all methodologies and choose (not by going through evals for whcih usually he/she may not have time for)
    • Independent Verification services companies such as mine (CVC, www.noveldv.com) can promote all methodologies equally and hence gain a wider "market penetration" :-)
    • Several design companies often seek for an independent voice on the methodology, and services companies can now talk about all 3 and if they already use say NCSIM, it may be just better for him to move to uRM. For instance in the last 1 month I met 2 of my potential clients here in Bangalore who use NC and they were looking at SystemVerilog, but I couldn;t talk to them about "effective way to use a vast language such as SV". I only had information on VMM & AVM and the clients finally said, let me call the CDN support to find out about uRM. But later one of them called me up and said due to project pressure he had to drop that idea for now (also he was told that uRM was new, not ready etc.). I wish I had enough info to show him on uRM on that day itself :-)


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by ajeetha
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.