Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 13476
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CDNLive! 2007: What will YOU be looking out for?

archive

Hi everyone,

Another CDNLive EMEA is just around the corner (Munich, May 14-16). The steering committee and organizers are hard at work picking a well-rounded contribution of technical papers, presentations and other cool stuff. Last year's event was definitely worth the trip to Nice - despite some healthy competition from the World Cup ;-)

I thought it'd be a good idea to start a topic and ask everyone: What will YOU be looking out for at CDNLive (EMEA, SV, the world!) this year wrt verification planning?

  • Technical papers on users' experience with planning methodology ?
  • Hot technologies like IPCM, Trailblazer or uRM ?
  • New product releases like Enterprise Manager 2.x ?
  • Tutorials, training or other face-to-face user discussions ?
My personal favorite will have to be planning and mixed-language environment integration: how do I create one plan and make sure I can track metrics coming in from different sources?

Whatever it is, other users are interested! Let us know!

Happy planning,

-Stelix.


Originally posted in cdnusers.org by stelix
Parents

  • Ajeetha you raise some interesting questions.

    How much do you feel your customers understand the relative benefits of different verification methodologies? You mention that they are interested in SV - why? I mean, it would make sense to me that one would pick a methodology and then implement it in the language of choice. Do you think that verification teams allocate enough time and energy in methodology evaluation and adoption?

    A good place to raise such questions and discuss IPCM (which encompasses uRM), other than this forum of course :-) is the IPC Forum on Wednesday (5/16) afternoon at CDNLive EMEA.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by stelix
Reply

  • Ajeetha you raise some interesting questions.

    How much do you feel your customers understand the relative benefits of different verification methodologies? You mention that they are interested in SV - why? I mean, it would make sense to me that one would pick a methodology and then implement it in the language of choice. Do you think that verification teams allocate enough time and energy in methodology evaluation and adoption?

    A good place to raise such questions and discuss IPCM (which encompasses uRM), other than this forum of course :-) is the IPC Forum on Wednesday (5/16) afternoon at CDNLive EMEA.


    Originally posted in cdnusers.org by stelix
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.